Recently I stumbled across the following. Take a look and consider its implications not just for your medical treatment, but for all aspects of your life.
One study found that when confronted with a patient with back pain, surgeons prescribed surgery, physical therapists thought that therapy was indicated and yes, acupuncturists were sure needles were the answer. Across the entire universe of patients, the single largest indicator of treatment wasn’t symptoms or patient background, it was the background of the doctor.
In other words, the conditioning of the particular specialist was the single biggest determinant in the solution he or she prescribed.
And what of your conditioning? When you visit your physician for diagnosis and treatment of an ailment, do you take into account her conditioning when she recommends surgery, that maybe her left-brained, science-fixes-all upbringing has something to do with her inclination to submit you to the scalpel? When depression lands you on the couch of a psychiatrist, do you picture the myriad forms of conditioning – some of them perhaps quite unpleasant or downright dysfunctional – that led him to become a psychiatrist in the first place?
Let’s say you have an ailment that forces you to seek help. Were you raised to respect and admire authority, to take the word of a doctor as gospel? Perhaps your mother, conditioned by her authoritarian, physician father, reminded you, again and again, “The doctor knows best,” and you unconsciously follow this thinking even while something inside you whispers, “This is a bad idea.”
Meanwhile your vegan homeopathist neighbor recommends a course or two of osteopathic “realignments” along with some meditation to relieve stress. But your neighbor is also a bit “out there” and you live in an upper-middle-class, conservative Christian neighborhood that doesn’t cotton to talk of chakras and kundalini. So you opt for the surgery.
Let’s take it a bit farther and suggest that the surgery does wonders for you – your problem is solved. Years later your own child faces the same medical predicament. You regale him with the entire story, the wisdom of your mother and the doctors, the lunacy of your neighbor, the joys of post-surgical relief. Your son has the surgery, he is crippled with pain for the remainder of his life. Which of your conditioned paths is to be believed?
So often life boils down to an argument over whose conditioning is “right.” We argue with a mate, a neighbor, a different political party or religious group, a foreign nation, about what we “know” to be true, rarely if ever stopping to ask, “How, exactly, do I know that to be true?” Our hypothetical parent could argue that her experience suggests doctors are right and that surgery works; except that none of it actually panned out for her son. She’s now so thoroughly confused and depressed she seeks out a psychiatrist and here we go again….
Einstein famously noted, “One cannot solve a problem with the same brain that created it.” The answer isn’t to “change the way we think” but to not think at all; to let our thoughts swirl past like flotsam on a river, neither rejecting nor identifying with them, until at last the “still inner voice” can be heard through the conditioned clamor of our supposed being.
i COMPLETELY agree with your comments on this subject, that is why whenever i have an ailment I was seek advice from an alcoholic…
‘ The only true wisdom, is in knowing you know nothing. ‘ apparently said by Socrates.
I’m still slowly drowning in my thoughts, but here’s another from Socrates : ‘ To find yourself, think for yourself. ‘
Why is it that all doctrines are so complex ? Is it to stop you from finding yourself ?
Socrates was in communication with that ‘still inner voice’ ; he called it his daimon or genius. It only answered him, what not to do. (intuition or guardian or complementary otherself ?)
Yogis tell us that everything is perfect there can be no right or wrong way there just is.
So which conditioned ‘truth’ to go for, yogi, elitist expert, self or other ? Reads like you, Doug, believe in that ‘still inner voice’ what ever it may be. Any ideas on what the nature of that inner voice might be ?
Alan Watts recommended doing nothing, as most of the time it tended to resolve itself. Perhaps he was waiting for last second inner guidance only when necessary ?
Which problem solving decision to make ? and people think they have free will. I’m still drowning in my thoughts, most of the time anyway. Where do thoughts originate and how do they interface with our mind and brain ? Are thoughts material like a magnetic field; can we detect them with instruments ? Back to being quite now.
What seems fairly clear to me now is that thoughts ARE our minds – there is no distinction, which is to say, there is no mind if there are no thoughts. What also seems increasingly clear is that there is no you, me, tree, chair, desk, but while the mind cognitively can nod in agreement, the knowing is limited because there is still a sense of ‘me’ knowing that. In other words, the “I” says, “I know that,” and so we’re still very much alive and well and separate and apart and looking at. There is a knowing someone knowing, if you will.
Instead I think the thoughts and bodies that comprise us and everyone else are spontaneously arising much the way an oak does from an acorn, a cloud from moisture, atoms breaking down and reforming, etc. There is only, for wont of a better term, awareness or intelligence knowing or presence through which all that spontaneous arising is known, and the knowing is knowing itself.
That’s the problem with words, once you have one you have the universe since that word presupposes a sentient being with language and thought and intelligence. “In the beginning was the word…..”
Which to me means all we’re ever really searching for is peace from the thoughts that make up ‘me’ and only parts of me at that (i.e. lots of life I enjoy, love, treasure, etc.). It’s the other parts, the anxious ones, the empty or lonely or painful times that I’d like to be rid of. And that peace must come from, as Gilbert Schultz recently said, “Allowing the seeing to see the absence of an I.”